Cryptocurrency markets have evolved rapidly over the past decade, transforming from niche digital experiments into major financial assets with substantial market capitalizations and global investor interest. As these digital assets mature, understanding their internal dynamics—particularly how volatility spreads across major coins—has become crucial for traders, portfolio managers, and financial researchers. This article explores the volatility spillover effects among the three leading cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin, Ether, and Litecoin, using a rigorous statistical framework known as the BEKK-MGARCH model.
By analyzing daily return data from August 2015 to July 2018, this study uncovers critical insights into how shocks and volatility are transmitted between these digital assets. The findings reveal significant interdependencies, bidirectional shock transmission, and dynamic conditional correlations, offering valuable implications for risk management and investment strategies in crypto markets.
Understanding Cryptocurrency Volatility and Interdependencies
Volatility in financial markets measures the degree of variation in asset prices over time. In cryptocurrency markets, volatility is notoriously high due to factors like speculative trading, regulatory uncertainty, and market sentiment shifts. However, beyond individual coin behavior, it's essential to examine how volatility in one cryptocurrency affects others—a phenomenon known as volatility spillover.
While numerous studies have analyzed Bitcoin’s price dynamics or isolated altcoin behaviors, fewer have explored cross-market volatility transmission. This gap is significant because rising market integration suggests that shocks in one major cryptocurrency can ripple through others, increasing systemic risk.
👉 Discover how real-time market analytics can help anticipate crypto volatility shifts.
The BEKK-MGARCH (Baba-Engle-Kraft-Kroner Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity) model is particularly suited for this analysis. It captures not only each asset's internal volatility patterns but also the conditional covariance between pairs of assets—enabling researchers to detect both shock transmission (immediate impact of price jumps) and volatility spillovers (longer-term influence of past volatility).
Data and Methodology
This study uses daily closing prices for Bitcoin, Ether, and Litecoin from August 7, 2015, to July 10, 2018—a period encompassing both bull and bear market phases. Daily returns are calculated using logarithmic price differences:
yi,t = ln(pi,t) − ln(pi,t−1)where pi,t is the price of cryptocurrency i on day t.
Descriptive Statistics
| Statistic | Bitcoin | Ether | Litecoin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Return | 0.29% | 0.47% | 0.27% |
| Std Deviation | 4.09% | 8.13% | 5.89% |
| Skewness | -0.26 | -3.52 | +1.36 |
| Kurtosis | 7.79 | 67.03 | 16.06 |
Key observations:
- Ether exhibits the highest volatility and extreme negative skewness, indicating frequent large downward movements.
- Litecoin shows positive skewness—large gains occur more often than large losses.
- All return series reject normality (via Jarque-Bera tests), showing fat tails and leptokurtic behavior typical of speculative assets.
- Unit root tests (ADF and PP) confirm stationarity in returns, allowing GARCH modeling.
Correlation Analysis
Simple Pearson correlations show strong positive linkages:
- Bitcoin–Litecoin: 0.58
- Bitcoin–Ether: 0.33
- Ether–Litecoin: 0.31
These suggest co-movement tendencies, especially between Bitcoin and Litecoin.
BEKK-MGARCH Model Framework
The BEKK-MGARCH model estimates the time-varying conditional covariance matrix Ht, defined as:
Ht = W'W + A'εt−1εt−1'A + B'Ht−1BWhere:
W= constant term matrixA= shock transmission coefficients (ARCH effects)B= volatility persistence coefficients (GARCH effects)εt−1= vector of previous residuals
Diagonal elements (αii, βii) capture an asset’s own volatility response to past shocks and past volatility. Off-diagonal elements (αij, βij, i≠j) indicate cross-market spillovers:
αij: Shock spillover from asset j to iβij: Volatility spillover from asset j to i
Conditional correlation at time t is derived as:
r12,t = h12,t / √(h11,t × h22,t)This allows tracking of evolving relationships between cryptocurrency pairs.
Key Empirical Findings
1. Intra-Asset Volatility Dynamics
For all three cryptocurrencies:
- Own past shocks (
αii) significantly affect current volatility (p < 0.01) - Past volatility (
βii) has even stronger influence, confirming high persistence - In all cases,
|αii| < |βii|, meaning volatility clustering dominates over shock impact
This implies that once a crypto asset becomes volatile, it tends to stay so for extended periods.
2. Shock Transmission Between Cryptocurrencies
Bitcoin–Ether Pair
- Bi-directional shock spillovers detected (
α12andα21both significant) α12 > 0: Shocks in Bitcoin increase Ether’s volatilityα21 < 0: Shocks in Ether reduce Bitcoin’s volatility—possibly due to safe-haven behavior or hedging flows
Bitcoin–Litecoin Pair
- Bi-directional negative spillovers: Lagged shocks in either coin reduce the other’s current volatility
- Suggests complex feedback mechanisms or arbitrage-driven dampening effects
Ether–Litecoin Pair
- Uni-directional shock spillover: Only
α21(from Ether to Litecoin) is significant - Indicates that news or shocks in Ether influence Litecoin, but not vice versa
👉 Learn how advanced trading tools can help manage exposure during volatile spillover events.
3. Volatility Spillover Effects
All three pairs show bi-directional volatility transmission:
- Past volatility in Bitcoin negatively affects Ether and Litecoin (
β12 < 0) - Conversely, past volatility in Ether or Litecoin positively impacts Bitcoin (
β21 > 0) - For Ether–Litecoin pair, both
β12andβ21are positive—indicating mutual reinforcement
This asymmetry suggests that Bitcoin may act as a stabilizing anchor during altcoin turbulence, while altcoin instability can amplify Bitcoin’s volatility.
Dynamic Conditional Correlations
Time-varying correlation plots reveal:
- Correlations fluctuate widely over time
- Most values are positive, supporting increasing market integration
- Sharp spikes occur around September 2017, coinciding with China’s ban on ICOs and cryptocurrency trading—a known market stress event
These peaks confirm that external regulatory shocks trigger synchronized market reactions across major cryptos.
Implications for Investors and Traders
Understanding volatility spillovers enables better portfolio construction and risk mitigation:
- Diversification benefits among cryptos may be limited due to high co-movement
- Hedging strategies should account for asymmetric spillover directions
- During periods of high conditional correlation, systemic risk rises—requiring tighter risk controls
Moreover, the evidence of bidirectional linkages supports the idea that cryptocurrency markets are becoming increasingly interconnected, behaving more like traditional financial markets than isolated digital bubbles.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What is a volatility spillover effect?
A: A volatility spillover occurs when the price fluctuations (volatility) of one financial asset influence the volatility of another. In crypto markets, this means that sharp moves in Bitcoin can trigger increased uncertainty and price swings in Ether or Litecoin.
Q: Why use the BEKK-MGARCH model?
A: The BEKK-MGARCH model ensures positive-definite covariance matrices and allows simultaneous estimation of own-market and cross-market volatility effects. It’s ideal for capturing complex interdependencies among multiple assets over time.
Q: Does Bitcoin still dominate altcoin markets?
A: Yes. The analysis shows strong bidirectional spillovers between Bitcoin and major altcoins, confirming its role as a market leader. However, growing reverse effects (e.g., Litecoin influencing Bitcoin) suggest increasing maturity and interdependence.
Q: Are cryptocurrencies good for diversification?
A: Historically yes—but less so now. Rising correlations, especially during crises, reduce diversification benefits. Investors should treat major cryptos as a related asset class rather than independent investments.
Q: How can traders use these findings?
A: Traders can anticipate volatility surges by monitoring leading indicators—e.g., a spike in Ether’s volatility may signal upcoming moves in Litecoin. Pair trading strategies can exploit asymmetric spillover patterns.
Conclusion
Using a BEKK-MGARCH framework on data from 2015–2018, this study provides robust evidence of complex volatility dynamics among Bitcoin, Ether, and Litecoin. Key findings include:
- Cryptocurrency volatility is highly persistent and influenced by both internal shocks and external spillovers
- Bi-directional shock and volatility transmissions exist between Bitcoin–Ether and Bitcoin–Litecoin
- A uni-directional shock spillover runs from Ether to Litecoin
- Time-varying conditional correlations are mostly positive, peaking during market stress
These results underscore the growing integration of cryptocurrency markets and highlight the need for sophisticated risk modeling tools in digital asset investing.
As the crypto ecosystem evolves, ongoing research into inter-market dynamics will remain essential for informed decision-making—whether you're a quant analyst, institutional investor, or retail trader navigating the waves of digital finance.
👉 Stay ahead with cutting-edge tools designed to analyze cross-market crypto volatility in real time.