A Proposal for Cryptocurrency Taxation in China: Insights from Xiamen National Institute of Accounting

·

The emergence of cryptocurrency has sparked global discussions around financial innovation, regulation, and taxation. As digital assets like Bitcoin gain traction worldwide, governments are grappling with how to integrate them into existing tax frameworks. In China, where cryptocurrency trading and fiat conversion are restricted, the debate over taxation remains both timely and complex. This article explores a comprehensive proposal from the Xiamen National Institute of Accounting on how China might approach cryptocurrency taxation, drawing insights from international practices and adapting them to domestic realities.

Global Approaches to Cryptocurrency Taxation

As nations experiment with regulatory models, their tax treatment of cryptocurrencies reflects broader policy goals—ranging from encouragement of innovation to prevention of financial instability.

United States: Capital Gains vs. Ordinary Income

The U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Notice 2014-21, establishing that cryptocurrencies are treated as property for federal tax purposes. This means every transaction involving crypto—whether it's buying goods, selling coins, or receiving payments—can trigger taxable events.

👉 Discover how global tax systems are adapting to digital assets

Despite clear rules, enforcement remains challenging due to anonymity and decentralized networks.

United Kingdom: Property-Based Taxation

Initially applying VAT to crypto transactions, the UK shifted course in 2014 by classifying Bitcoin as private property. The HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) clarified:

In 2019, HMRC updated guidance listing specific activities that generate tax liability, including staking and hard forks.

Japan: Legal Tender Treatment with High Tax Rates

Japan recognizes cryptocurrency as legal payment method under the Payment Services Act. Key features include:

Japan treats crypto similarly to stocks but imposes higher effective rates, reflecting caution toward speculative behavior.

Australia: Barter Transaction Framework

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) views cryptocurrency transactions as barter arrangements. Key principles:

Australia’s framework emphasizes purpose—investment vs. personal use—which determines tax exposure.

Toward a Chinese Cryptocurrency Tax Framework

While China prohibits cryptocurrency trading and banking services related to digital assets, blockchain technology is actively promoted. Given this nuanced stance, the Xiamen National Institute of Accounting proposes a cautious yet forward-looking approach: taxing cryptocurrency at key lifecycle stages without legitimizing unrestricted circulation.

Why Taxation Is Necessary Despite Restrictions

Even with domestic trading bans:

Without a taxation mechanism, China risks significant tax base erosion and loss of fiscal control over digital economy activities.

Proposed Taxation Model: Three Key Stages

The model focuses on three taxable moments: mining, circulation, and disposal.

1. Mining Stage: Taxing Creation of Value

Mining generates new coins and verifies transactions—activities that create economic value. The report suggests treating mining income as service-based revenue.

Value-Added Tax (VAT)

Income Tax

👉 Learn how digital economies are reshaping tax systems globally

2. Circulation Stage: Transactions Using Crypto

When users pay with Bitcoin for goods or services, it constitutes a non-cash transaction akin to barter.

VAT Treatment

Treat as mutual sale-purchase:

Income Tax

3. Disposal Stage: Selling Cryptocurrencies

Selling mined or acquired Bitcoin triggers final realization of gain or loss.

VAT

Income Tax

Strengthening Tax Administration

Effective taxation requires robust enforcement mechanisms tailored to crypto’s unique attributes.

1. Establish Government-Sanctioned Trading Platforms

A regulated exchange would:

However, this risks undermining decentralization ideals and raises privacy concerns—trade-offs requiring careful balancing.

2. Build Advanced Monitoring Systems

Tax authorities should develop blockchain analytics tools to:

3. Enhance International Cooperation

Cryptocurrencies transcend borders. China should:

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can China legally tax something it bans?
A: Yes. Taxation does not imply legalization. Governments often tax illicit or restricted goods (e.g., tobacco, gambling). What matters is economic value creation.

Q: How can taxes be enforced if transactions are anonymous?
A: Through regulated gateways—such as exchanges and mining pools—and advanced blockchain forensics tools that trace wallet activity even without full identity disclosure.

Q: Would taxing mining discourage technological development?
A: Not necessarily. Properly structured taxes can coexist with innovation incentives. Tax revenue could even fund R&D in blockchain infrastructure.

Q: Is there precedent for taxing unregulated assets?
A: Yes. Many countries tax offshore income or undeclared cash economies. The principle is universal: economic benefit triggers tax liability regardless of legality.

Q: What happens if someone uses a foreign exchange?
A: While harder to track, international cooperation and bank-level controls can flag suspicious inflows/outflows tied to crypto proceeds.

Conclusion

As digital finance evolves, so must taxation systems. While China maintains strict controls on cryptocurrency circulation, the Xiamen National Institute of Accounting’s proposal offers a pragmatic path forward: targeted taxation at value-creation points, supported by modern administration tools.

By learning from U.S., UK, Japanese, and Australian models—and adapting them to China’s regulatory environment—the country can protect its tax base, promote fairness, and prepare for a future where digital assets play a larger role in the economy.

👉 Explore how next-generation financial systems are being built today