The Ethereum blockchain experienced significant growth in 2021, with a total of 18.36 million new addresses holding a non-zero ETH balance joining the network. This translates to an average of 1.53 million new addresses per month, signaling strong user adoption despite growing competition in the smart contract platform space.
While the number of new addresses surged, key on-chain metrics such as daily transaction volume and the count of large holders—commonly known as "whales"—have shown signs of decline. This contrast highlights a complex picture of Ethereum’s ecosystem: expanding in user base but facing challenges in sustained engagement and scalability.
Steady Growth in Ethereum Addresses
According to data from blockchain analytics firm IntoTheBlock, Ethereum gained 18.36 million addresses with positive balances throughout 2021. The growth was particularly notable after October, when approximately 10 million new addresses were created in just over four months.
This expansion reflects increasing interest in decentralized applications (dApps), decentralized finance (DeFi), and non-fungible tokens (NFTs)—all primarily built on Ethereum. Despite Ethereum’s price reaching all-time highs during the year, the correlation between price surges and new address creation was not direct, suggesting that adoption is being driven more by utility than speculation alone.
👉 Discover how blockchain networks are evolving with real-time data and insights.
Decline in Active Address Ratio
Although the total number of addresses grew, the percentage of active addresses—those participating in transactions—has decreased. On January 1, 2021, active addresses made up 1.05% of the total. This peaked at 1.66% on April 25 but had dropped to 0.86% by mid-February of the following year.
This downward trend suggests that while many users are acquiring ETH or interacting with the network briefly, long-term engagement remains a challenge. A growing number of addresses may be dormant or used for speculative holding rather than active participation in DeFi protocols, NFT marketplaces, or other on-chain activities.
Fewer Whales, More Decentralization?
Another notable trend is the decline in the number of Ethereum whales—wallets holding more than 1,000 ETH. As reported by on-chain analytics platform Glassnode on February 13, the count of such large holders reached a four-year low of 6,226.
While this could indicate profit-taking or redistribution of wealth across smaller wallets, it may also reflect migration to Layer 2 solutions or sidechains where transaction costs are lower. A reduction in whale concentration might signal increased decentralization, which is generally seen as positive for network health and resilience.
Transaction Volume Stagnation
Despite growing adoption, daily transaction volume on Ethereum has plateaued. Data from YCharts shows that since mid-December 2021, average daily transactions have hovered around 1.2 million.
Several factors contribute to this stagnation:
- High gas fees: During periods of network congestion, transaction costs can become prohibitively expensive for average users.
- Emergence of alternatives: Cheaper and faster options like Polygon (MATIC) and other Layer 2 scaling solutions have drawn significant activity away from the main Ethereum chain.
Sameep Singhania, founder of Quickswap—a decentralized exchange on Polygon—cited high gas fees as a primary reason for building on Polygon instead of Ethereum’s mainnet.
The Rise of Polygon and Competing Chains
Polygon has emerged as a major competitor, especially in terms of transaction throughput. Since its usage spike in May 2021, Polygon’s average daily transaction volume has more than doubled Ethereum’s, currently processing around 3 million transactions per day.
This shift underscores a broader trend: users and developers are increasingly opting for scalable, cost-effective alternatives that maintain compatibility with Ethereum’s infrastructure. These networks offer faster confirmations and lower fees while still allowing access to Ethereum-based dApps and assets.
👉 Explore how next-gen blockchain platforms are redefining scalability and user experience.
Ethereum Still Leads in Total Value Locked (TVL)
Despite competition, Ethereum remains the dominant force in decentralized finance. According to DeFi Llama, Ethereum holds a staggering **$124.24 billion in total value locked (TVL)**—more than eight times that of its nearest competitor, Terra (LUNA), which had $15.04 billion at the time of reporting.
This TVL dominance reflects deep liquidity, mature protocols like Uniswap, Aave, and MakerDAO, and strong developer activity. Even as users migrate to Layer 2s for transactions, most value still originates from and returns to the Ethereum mainnet.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What does "non-zero balance" mean for an Ethereum address?
A: A non-zero balance means the address holds at least some amount of ETH or an ERC-20 token. It indicates that the wallet has been funded at least once and is part of the active ecosystem.
Q: Why are fewer whales holding large amounts of ETH?
A: The decline in whale counts could result from profit-taking, distribution to smaller investors, or movement of funds to Layer 2 networks and sidechains where transactions are cheaper and faster.
Q: How does Polygon achieve higher transaction volumes than Ethereum?
A: Polygon uses a Layer 2 scaling solution that processes transactions off-chain before settling them on Ethereum. This reduces congestion and lowers fees, enabling higher throughput.
Q: Does stagnant transaction volume mean Ethereum is failing?
A: Not necessarily. Stagnant volume reflects scalability limits rather than declining relevance. With ongoing upgrades like the Merge and future rollups, Ethereum aims to improve throughput without sacrificing security.
Q: Is it still worth building on Ethereum despite high fees?
A: Yes, for projects prioritizing security, decentralization, and access to deep liquidity. Many developers use Layer 2 solutions to combine Ethereum’s robustness with improved scalability.
Q: Will Ethereum ever surpass its current transaction limits?
A: Yes—through a series of upgrades collectively known as Ethereum 2.0, including sharding and enhanced Layer 2 integration, which aim to increase scalability to potentially 100,000 transactions per second in the long term.
👉 Stay ahead of blockchain innovation with tools that track real-time network performance and trends.
Final Thoughts
Ethereum’s journey in 2021 showcased both its strengths and vulnerabilities. With 18.36 million new addresses, it solidified its position as the leading smart contract platform. However, challenges like high gas fees, declining whale concentration, and stagnant transaction volume highlight the urgent need for scalable solutions.
The rise of Polygon and other Layer 2 ecosystems isn't a threat—it's a natural evolution. These networks extend Ethereum’s reach, offering users speed and affordability while keeping value anchored to the main chain.
As Ethereum continues its transition to proof-of-stake and embraces advanced scaling technologies, its ability to maintain leadership will depend not just on innovation, but on delivering a seamless, accessible experience for millions of global users.
Core Keywords: Ethereum, blockchain, smart contract platform, total value locked (TVL), Layer 2 solutions, Polygon, active addresses, transaction volume